Sinopses(1)

O sumiço repentino de uma grande quantidade de dinheiro em uma empresa multimilionária cria uma cadeia de suspeitas entre os membros da família que dirigem o negócio. Enquanto Ivo Rona, o longevo CEO da companhia, e sua família procuram o culpado, Marie, uma de suas funcionárias de maior confiança, desaparece. Um plano de vingança, sabotagem corporativa ou uma eficiente fraude virtual? Uma coisa é certa: alguém entre eles não é confiável. (São Paulo IFF)

(mais)

Críticas (2)

Dar prioridades:

J*A*S*M 

todas as críticas do utilizador

inglês A brilliantly executed first act. It hooked me up with interesting characters and a story shrouded in mystery, and I was really curious to see where it was all going and what was behind it. Moreover, the performances are almost all well above-par, and Donutil could easily take home the award for acting. But from the scene in the mountain cottage, or more specifically, from the moment when one character utters a completely unintentional "profanity" (a great example of lazy screenwriting – I almost said "ouch" out loud as it hurt), the film completely stopped working for me and the whole thing seemed to fall apart – thematically, in tone, in the logic of the characters' behaviour and in the performances. Suddenly it's clear what's going on, and the film stops moving forward. What Bird Atlas is ultimately about – and what I obviously don't want to spoil – is an interesting cinematic theme, familiar from the occasional police procedural, but from my point of view they didn’t handle it convincingly. For me it was a disappointment, but in the first act I really thought it was very good. And the scenes with the birds... they seemed like a rather random and shallow joke to make the film more formally special, they simply don’t fit organically with the rest. ()

angel74 

todas as críticas do utilizador

inglês Olmo Omerzu had a stroke of luck when he cast Miroslav Donutil in the lead role. He shone here with an absolutely precise acting performance. Bird Atlas points to the truly cautionary fact that on the one hand, today's man "enjoys" the conveniences of contemporary civilization while on the other, blindly continuing in their eternal chase after mammon. Money and wealth are becoming the object of worship! With the help of (fittingly symbolic) bird chirping, the filmmakers slip a few pearls of wisdom into the story, most of which we all know well. But the problem is that we never really lived according to them, or perhaps we did not really want to. And perhaps this is the crux of why the film did not appeal to many viewers. (80%) ()