Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle

A ação é confusa e neurótica, as paródias dos filmes são embaraçosas, o enredo praticamente inexistente. Se alguém tivesse misturado as bobinas de película no cinema, você nem repararia nisso. Se este filme for um sucesso comercial, marcará o início do fim do bom entretenimento cinematográfico americano - porque não é preciso mais do que um grande orçamento para fazer algo assim. Ainda bem que morrerei com a geração atual e não testemunharei uma época em que 90% da produção de Hollywood seguirá esta equação. (20/06/2003)

Yeah, it’s awful bollocks. But can I honestly be mad at a film that openly admits its awfulness in every scene, doesn't take itself seriously at all, and is filmed at a killer pace that doesn't let you get bored? Sometimes, with a certain amount of detachment, you can actually enjoy this kind of bullshit. Which is not to say that I seek out this type of entertainment. (29/10/2005)

Bigger, rougher, and more action-packed may not always be harmful and ruin the impression of the first part. With the angels, there is nothing to ruin because I avoid the first one by several kilometers. The stupid bantering is surprisingly bearable this time, and the action is not only watchable but even great. Moreover, the central trio gained a lot of sex appeal with a shovel. (07/08/2006)

I enjoyed these Angels perhaps even more than the first one, it's just a pity Bill Murray didn't attend, though he probably knew why. In other words, it's bullshit, but beautiful. And there’s John Cleese. And Demi Moore. Yeah, and Lucy, Drew, and Cameron...there's a lot there:-))) (04/06/2009)