Impostor

Um tema maravilhoso que merecia um argumento com menos erros e uma realização mais digna. Impostor parece ter sido feito em três semanas num estúdio de filmes B. Como ficção científica de alto orçamento da Europa de Leste, teria sido uma agradável surpresa. Como um blockbuster de Hollywood baseado em Philip K. Dick, é um fracasso. Só pode ser avaliado com três estrelas graças à direção dinâmica, que não nos aborrece nem por um segundo. (17/02/2003)

The only good thing about this film is its depressing ending. Otherwise, it’s cheap slog with terrible visual effects and shot without a shred of inventiveness. A lot more could have been squeezed out of a source material as interesting as Dick’s. Gary Sinise hasn't made anything good in years, and Impostor, which he even produced, is further proof of his decline. The only positive is that Madeleine Stowe is still beautiful. For her and for the satisfactory ending, I’m giving two stars. (22/06/2003)

Here I would blame the writer and director. With a very well put together cast, it would definitely be possible to raise Impostor higher than just being average and uncertain. Unfortunately, the twist of the story is so obvious that a potential second viewing is almost out of the question and it becomes pointless, even though the fundamental idea was more than solid. (27/04/2007)