Exorcist: The Beginning
Realização:
Renny HarlinArgumento:
Alexi HawleyCâmara:
Vittorio StoraroMúsica:
Trevor RabinElenco:
Stellan Skarsgård, Izabella Scorupco, James D'Arcy, Julian Wadham, Antonie Kamerling, David Bradley, Alan Ford, Ben Cross, Ralph Brown, Michel Leroy (mais)Conteúdos(1)
In the post-World War II world, Merrin (Stellan Skarsgard) has seen his faith lapse due to some tumultuous firsthand experiences on the battlefield. Taking a lengthy sabbatical in an attempt to rekindle his belief, Merrin travels to East Africa. While there, he encounters an archaeological team who have uncovered a Byzantine-era church which, astonishingly, shows no visible signs of decay. Upon investigating the remarkable find, Merrin happens upon a crypt beneath the church, and inadvertently unleashes the same omnipotent demon that he duels with in the first EXORCIST movie. The local villagers unwittingly succumb to the powerful otherworldly force, and as chaos breaks out, Merrin experiences a cruel sense of irony when the very horrors he sought to escape engulf him once more. (texto oficial do distribuidor)
(mais)Críticas (4)
Filmado com habilidade, com um bom cenário e uma composição pormenorizada que presta atenção às cores da imagem. Mas o que se passa ali... isso é difícil de perceber. Uma mistura catastrófica dos motivos muitas vezes vistos, sobretudo o trauma dos nazis, e as mais fáceis equações que provocam o nojo, lembrando quase o velho trash eurotrash. Se não tivesse Stellan Skarsgård, em quem acreditará tudo, nem valeria as pobres 2*.
()
It's already discouraging that the film is conceived to ride on the wave of popularity of the first and already legendary The Exorcist, but it only succeeds very sporadically. The huge amount of poorly done effects (terrible hyenas) was surprising and seemed quite strange for a big production. On the other hand, it's not surprising from good-old Harlin, who seems to have undergone a brain operation in the new century. He can't direct actors and doesn't know what to do. Several scenes are good, the lighting work deserves attention, but in terms of the screenplay, the new Exorcist is quite uneven and the ending is nonsense.
()
I love the original The Exorcist and consider it the best horror film of all time. Its sequel... Um, how do I put this... I hate the sequel. Except for The Beginning, which has some distinct pluses (and it's a prequel). First of all, the setting - 99% of the plot (i.e., everything except the flashbacks) takes place in Africa, where you have the feeling that some mystical evil is lurking around every corner. Second, Stellan Skarsgård. Thirdly, Harlin's direction, which doesn't play at anything innovative and, where it can, copies Friedkin's tried-and-true and impressive style from the original film. Fourth, the rawness, the gore and the generally dense atmosphere that runs through the film. Bottom line: I'm satisfied. Although it's not like the original film (because nothing is).
()
"The Exorcist: Birth" is simply something that builds on a great film and not such a great series for me, and it creates its own myth, which is not entirely bad and works. Unfortunately, the connection with World War II felt very gratuitous in this case, and the plot could have easily done without it. Only Stellan's character gets an additional dimension through it, and Father Merrin remains the most interesting.
()