kaylin

Quentin Tarantino likes similar films. Violence, erotica bordering on porn, tough guys, sand, weapons, honor, and things like that. That is probably why he decided to back the film "Death Proof," which ended after the first few minutes. The story lacks cohesion, unnecessarily revolving around a huge number of characters, so that only two or three are truly important. The dialogues are truly terrible, and I often wondered why the hell those people were saying something like that? It doesn't make any sense at all. Choosing attractive women, a few famous names, this is not a guarantee of success. The film is boring because the action is minimal. It copies Tarantino, or rather steals from him, but it falls far below his level. The best thing about the film is the poster. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/prcicky-bruce-lee-par-trapnosti.html

So far the most terrible thing I've seen this year. Nothing new under the sun, but this is not a movie. This is misery. Where is the humor when scenes from other movies are lined up, pretending to be different and funny? Is this the answer to the modern definition of satire? If so, I really wonder where society is heading. What am I supposed to laugh at in this movie? That all the actors embarrass themselves and are unable to make a single joke funny? Firstly, it's not even possible. Secondly, why??? Do those actors need to make so much money? Is no one capable of making fun of movies in a sophisticated way anymore? "Naked Gun" was also awkward, but there were jokes that made you laugh. I hope someone comes along who can make satire. And forget about miserable toilet humor, shots of breasts when they don't know what else to do, and show us that we can laugh at intelligent things too. I hope it happens soon. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/prcicky-bruce-lee-par-trapnosti.html

And we're getting to the worse part. However, Christopher Nielsen had a great idea. He won't be filming any animated film that Hollywood promotes. Nothing childish and kind, but a properly sharpened film that will be vulgar, show us copulation, and even one terrible elephant that should die right at the beginning. Simon Pegg took over the rewriting into English and made the film accessible to the masses. Unfortunately, it's not worth it. The jokes are not good, the situations are bizarre. Kevin Smith may have been able to build a plot about freeing animals from laboratories, but that doesn't apply to "Jimmy". It's all a little green - meaning ecological - and it tries to get us there by talking a lot about... nothing. The rhythm is good, it's a shame the humor is missing. What's worse is the animation. It simply fails. It should present us with caricatures, but the animation quality itself is terrible. I was looking forward to the film, but it's not worth it. One addicted elephant won't save everything, especially when you constantly have the urge to trip up his crooked legs. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/prcicky-bruce-lee-par-trapnosti.html

After the series "Prciček", I turned to a completely different genre and finally watched a movie that I had been looking forward to for an incredibly long time, but I never got to see it because I simply didn't have the desire, there wasn't enough time, etc. But when I finally decided, I found out that Bruce Lee was simply a master. He wasn't a master of filmmaking, "Enter the Dragon" isn't such a great movie and it doesn't bring anything new, but what he, a master of martial arts, showcases is breathtaking. Jackie Chan became famous mainly for his martial arts, which is essentially a dance. It looks great, it's effective, but it's still a dance. Bruce Lee doesn't dance. Bruce Lee fights. It's still martial arts, but there is nothing gentle about it. His movements are focused, precise, effective. He literally flies in individual scenes, captures attention, even when he speaks with that amazing accent. No, I wouldn't want to meet him as his opponent. If he accomplished something, it was directing a film where the fights look real. Maybe too real. As is generally known, "Enter the Dragon" was his last film because he succumbed to an injury he caused himself while filming this movie. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/prcicky-bruce-lee-par-trapnosti.html

I thought that "Svatba" was a great ending to an excellent series, but as it turned out, the best was yet to come. I automatically give a high rating to the "Prcičky" because they are movies that genuinely make me laugh. There aren't as many movies like that. "Svatba" is a great compilation of diverse gags that are good, better, and even better. This is Steve Stifler's film, and it mainly revolves around him, even though it should actually revolve around the wedding. But as soon as Stifler appears, it's an incredible spectacle. I enjoyed every second with him, and when he spoke with a mouth full of crap, I couldn't control myself at all. Maybe the jokes aren't the best, they aren't always original, but they are delivered excellently. No, it's not about the story for me, it's about the feeling I take away. And that feeling is great. Excellent. Unique. I don't have similar feelings after watching a movie very often. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/prcicky-bruce-lee-par-trapnosti.html

Second sequels are not always successful, and "Prciček 2" definitely wasn't. It was basically just about the old gang getting back together a year after graduation to party at a fancy bash. It's once again Jim and his dad's concert and Stifler's insults. Lines like "Fuck my stick," "Santa porn star," or "Artificial cocks for everyone" are unforgettable, as well as the scene with the glue, which can happen to anyone. The film's mythology is further developed, some relationships form, others end. The film is a preview of what is yet to come, but it doesn't lack its charm, which is among other things also in the amazing soundtrack, which is simply perfectly chosen. Everything is geared towards the young, the partying, and the wilderness, but in a way that doesn't discourage even someone like me who doesn't party. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/prcicky-bruce-lee-par-trapnosti.html

The fourth regular continuation of the film "Prci, prci, prcičky" made it to the cinema, so I thought it would be nice to remember them. It's not a brilliant film, but it's a good film, no doubt about it. For me, it was a huge milestone because I hadn't seen a similar comedy before. Actually, nobody had seen a similar comedy before. It was vulgar, truly vulgar, with exposed breasts, sex with a pie, and Stifler. A perfectly mixed cocktail that didn't need a great story because it relied on good jokes, memorable characters, and just the right amount of obscenities and nonsense, which meant one thing - young people would be thrilled, their parents would faint, and the film would be forbidden to them. I didn't have the film forbidden, and I think it influenced me a lot. I am vulgar, and I take it for granted, I use curses and quotes from the film. I grew up with "Prcičky" and I'm not ashamed of it. The film is still good for me, and I'll gladly watch it again sometime. So my rating is very subjective.

I don't care what critics say about this film. I don't care if someone will criticize it. I don't care that none of the actors are big stars and they took the film because it suited them, because this is simply a film for people. It is full of humor, both good and awkward - but the good outweighs the awkward by far - it is full of great lines and characters that you want to come back to. A beautiful nostalgia came over me, I couldn't hold back my emotions. I know it's because I live a little bit in a fictional world, but that's just how it is with age. There is so much film and literature that it's easy to detach oneself from reality. But when I saw the five of them (Jim, Kev, Oz, Finch, and Stifler) marching to the reunion, I felt happy. It was like I really met up with the old gang. A wonderful experience that I haven't had in the cinema for a long time. I wish there would be a sequel, I doubt it for now, but it would be great. I would go to the cinema for that. "American Reunion" did something that "Snowdrops and Macho Men 25 Years Later" couldn't do. It combined humor and nostalgia in such a cocktail that is funny, touching, and not just a walk through a museum where everyone has aged and gained weight and simply have nothing to say anymore. Jim and his gang still have something to say, because they know how to entertain. For me personally, one of the best cinema experiences. Seeing people leave happy with a smile on their face is an incredible reward for the creators of the film. I was also one of those who had to come back to the lines, repeat the scenes. An unforgettable experience. If I had to rate it in percentages, I would give it 90%, and I say that completely seriously. "Hunger Games" is nowhere near as boring and tedious. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/skolni-sraz-kinozazitek-roku.html

The viewer in Hunger Games apparently got what he wanted. The pseudo-original theme, which is killed by the burden of romance and seemingly tough scenes, in shots that want to appear so artistically that they sound cheap. Never mind that the film devoured all the interesting ideas that this theme should have. Just as long as there are cool heroes, some tender love, and especially incredibly terrible costumes, for which the film deserves a Raspberry award, preferably rotten. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/proc-maji-hunger-games-takovy-uspech.html

Ridley Scott, my eternal film enemy. I don't seek out his movies, but sometimes they find their way to me, just like the three-hour "American Gangster" did. You might ask why someone who doesn't love Scott would watch one of his longest films. One reason is that it was somewhat of a challenge. The second reason is that I did some work on the film, so it didn't bother me that much. "American Gangster" is not a bad film because Russell Crowe - and it's hard to admit this - is simply a good actor. Similarly, Denzel Washington, who perhaps overly resembles his pose in "Training Day". The film is a nice look at the end of the 60s and a real-life African-American gangster who took over the New York drug underworld but ultimately paid for it. Not terribly, because he then exposed everyone he could and the detective who caught him became his advocate and secured a reduced sentence for him. Frank Lucas is still among us and Ridley Scott presents his interesting story to us, which is skillfully directed, supported by great actors, but it just somehow lacks the right emotions. A good biographical film. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/diar-milovnika-filmu-c-005-reziser.html